Handshaking lemma proof by contradiction pdf

Proofs of parity results via the handshaking lemma. For complete video series visit graphs more learning resources and full videos are only. But since each handshake involves two people, this should be twice the number of handshakes. In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the handshaking lemma is the statement that every finite undirected graph has an even number of vertices with odd degree the number of edges touching the vertex. This theorem applies even if multiple edges and loops are present. Cs 7 graph theory lecture 2 february 14, 2012 further reading rosen k. The handshaking lemma is one of the important branches of graph theory. Handshaking lemma, theorem, proof and examples youtube.

A graph is called 3regularor cubic if every vertex has degree 3. Suppose that vertices represent people at a party and an edge indicates that the people who are its end vertices shake hands. Then, by the pumping lemma, there is a pumping length p such that all strings s. In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the handshaking lemma is the statement that every. Graph coloring i acoloringof a graph is the assignment of a color to each vertex so that no two adjacent vertices are assigned the same color. To prove a statement p is true, we begin by assuming p false and show that this leads to a contradiction. So this is a valuable technique which you should use sparingly. In the proof, youre allowed to assume x, and then show that y is true, using x. Certainly, though, this question is of interest to research mathematicians, and is specifically about mathematical writing. If we set g as a connected flat chart, for any real number k,l0. Proofs of parity results via the handshaking lemma mathoverflow. So, n is such that there is a connected graph on n vertices and n 2 edges.

Start adding nodes and edges until you cover the whole graph. The theorem holds this rule that if several people shake hands, the total number of hands shake must be even that is why the theorem is called handshaking theorem. Assuming the logic is sound, the only option is that the assumption that p is not true is incorrect. Following are some interesting facts that can be proved using handshaking lemma. Part4 handshaking theorem in graph theory in hindi or. The result that the sum of the degrees of a graph is twice the number of its edges explanation of handshaking lemma. Since g is connected, there is a path between any two distinct vertices. Nov 23, 2017 handshaking lemma, theorem, proof and examples duration. The handshaking lemma is a consequence of the degree sum formula also sometimes called the handshaking lemma how is handshaking lemma useful in tree data structure. In more colloquial terms, in a party of people some of whom shake hands, an even number of people must have shaken an odd number of other peoples hands. I thechromatic numberof a graph is the least number of colors needed to color it. The di erence in our proof technique lies in the way we combine these two cases.

Since every edge is incident with exactly two vertices,each edge gets counted twice,once at each end. We go by contradiction, assuming that it is false, and we take n to be the smallest. Another even number of people 20 will shake hands an even number of times 10. Then, by the pumping lemma, there is a pumping length p such that all strings s in e of length p or more can be written as s xyz where 1. The following lemma will be used in the proof of theorem 1. Based on the assumption that p is not true, conclude something impossible. The proof is by contradiction and uses the handshaking lemma. K 3 has no cutedges, so it cannot be obtained by adding an edge between two distinct components. To prove that p is true, assume that p is not true. A little graph theory the handshaking lemma showing 11 of 1 messages. Minimum degree and maximum degree of a graph in graph theory in hindi.

The handshaking lemma in any graph, the sum of all the vertexdegree is equal to twice the number of edges. Its a principle that is reminiscent of the philosophy of a certain fictional detective. Oct 12, 2012 handshaking lemma, theorem, proof and examples. An even number of people 10 will shake hands an odd number of times 29.

A better way to phrase it might be, what are good ways to present proofs of theorems requiring auxiliary lemmas. Hardy described proof by contradiction as one of a mathematicians finest weapons, saying it is a far finer gambit than any. In any graph, there is an even number of odd degree vertices. Handshaking lemma why is it called the handshaking lemma. Not hard to prove, but a triviality given the immediate. Well represent each person by a vertex, and when two people shake hands, we will draw an edge between them. Proof by contradiction is also known as indirect proof, proof by assuming the opposite, and reductio ad impossibile. Otherwise, by the lemma there was previously a path between the endpoints of e in the k, and since optimal and kruskals algorithm. I the number of edges is then equal to the number of handshakes.

Application of the handshaking lemma in the dyeing theory. Applying euler formula and handshaking lemma, explains the sum of the initial rights as a constant. Eulers proof of the degree sum formula uses the technique of double. Maybe one nested lemma is ok, but if i could avoid it i would just put the lemma before, and say something like. Black 22 april 2008 prove that the language e fw 201 jw has an equal number of 0s and 1sg is not regular. We begin with a lemma implicit in the proof of theorem 1 in sridharan et al. For example, a 3regular graph, in which every vertex has degree 3, must have an even number of vertices. Example proof using the pumping lemma for regular languages. Summary handshaking lemma paths and cycles in graphs connectivity, eulerian graphs 1.

Handshaking lemma and interesting tree properties geeksforgeeks. Chapter 17 proof by contradiction university of illinois. Proof we prove the required result by contradiction. What are good ways to present proofs of theorems requiring. The content is widely applied in topology and computer science. Graphs i plan definition more terms the handshaking theorem.

Part4 handshaking theorem in graph theory in hindi or sum. I if we ask each person v how many times she shook hands. I a graph is kcolorableif it is possible to color it using k colors. Many of the statements we prove have the form p q which, when negated, has the form p. This is apowerful prooftechnique that can be extremely useful in the right circumstances. From this assumption, p 2 can be written in terms of a b, where a and b have no common factor. V with u 6 v, and therefore a path between v and u. I recently read joaos calculational proof of the handshaking lemma. If we were formally proving by contradiction that sally had paid her ticket, we would assume that she did not pay her ticket and deduce that therefore she should have got a nasty letter from the council.

It is a particular kind of the more general form of argument known as. Both results were proven by leonhard euler 1736 in his famous paper on the seven bridges of. Let g v,e be a connected graph with n 1 vertices and n. Alternatively, you can do a proof by contradiction. H discrete mathematics and its applications, 5th ed. In an undirected graph, the degree of a vertex v, denoted by degv, is the number of edges adjacent to v. Proof by contradiction a proof by contradiction is a proof that works as follows. Proof since each edge has two ends, it must contribute exactly 2 to the sum of the degrees. Suppose now for the purpose of contradiction that ghas diameter greater than 2. If ghas diameter 1, then gis a single edge, and so possesses too few vertices to support a k 3. This topic has a huge history of philosophic conflict.

The following are the consequences of the handshaking lemma. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that, for some m and n where m n, there is. In that proof we needed to show that a statement p. Prove that a 3regular graph has an even number of vertices.

If you really want to state the theorem before the lemma, then your second option is better. Graphs usually but not always are thought of showing how things are set of things are connected together. Proof by contradiction also known as indirect proof or the method of reductio ad absurdum is a common proof technique that is based on a very simple principle. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that, for some m and n where m n, there is a way to distribute m objects into n bins such that each bin contains at most one object. Brouwe r claimed that proof by contradiction was sometimes invalid.

If for each question, we count the students that answered that question then we have counted each student exactly 5 times. Assume, for the purposes of contradiction, that there is a stable matching. The handshaking lemma does not apply to infinite graphs, even when they have only a finite number of odddegree vertices. Otherwise, by the lemma there was previously a path. Handshaking lemma, theorem, proof and examples duration. The proof follows the proof of the handshaking lemma. Application of the handshaking lemma in the dyeing theory of.

The handshake lemma 2, 5, 9 sets g as a communication flat graph, and that, where fgis the face set of g. Since q2 is an integer and p2 2q2, we have that p2 is even. We began with a brief discussion of course policies, which are available online here. One thing that a lot of people have trouble getting used to as they learn to write proof is that it is, primarily, a form of communication, not a means of computation, and for that reason a good proof is mostly verbal in nature, with equations and computations punctuating the sentences and paragraphs. However, contradiction proofs tend to be less convincing and harder to write than. Chapter 17 proof by contradiction this chapter covers proofby contradiction. An introduction to proof by contradiction, a powerful method of mathematical proof. Example proof using the pumping lemma for regular languages andrew p. The argument given above easily generalizes to give. Beginning around 1920, a prominent dutch mathematician by the name of l. In logic and mathematics, proof by contradiction is a form of proof that establishes the truth or the validity of a proposition, by showing that assuming the proposition to be false leads to a contradiction. For instance, an infinite path graph with one endpoint has only a single odddegree vertex rather than having an even number of such vertices.

Proof since the degree of a vertex is the number of edges incident with that vertex, the sum of degree counts the total number of times an edge is incident with a vertex. Lecture 6 trees and forests university of manchester. The basis of the development of the dyeing theory used in this research paper is to discuss the application of the right transfer method in dyeing theory. The proof began with the assumption that p was false, that is that.

We go by contradiction, assuming that it is false, and we take n to be the smallest counterexample. It is a particular kind of the more general form of argument known as reductio ad absurdum. Both results were proven by leonhard euler in his famous paper on the seven bridges of konigsberg that began the study of graph theory. Gjergi zaimi already mentioned the relevance of the complexity classes ppa and ppad. For a contradiction, suppose g is a counterexample and that f is minimal. The handshaking lemma is a consequence of the degree sum formula also sometimes called the handshaking lemma, for a graph with vertex set v and edge set e. We will now look at a very important and well known lemma in graph theory. Proof by contradiction this is an example of proof by contradiction. Handshaking lemma article about handshaking lemma by the. Theorem of the day the handshaking lemma in any graph the sum of the vertex degrees is equal to twice the number of edges. Well need this method in chapter 20, when we cover the topic of uncountability. Prove by induction that, if gv,e is an undirected graph, then.

727 1352 1257 216 602 984 461 1211 1396 113 811 137 322 818 250 142 935 827 375 989 430 586 806 745 584 705 959 1088 1452 495 1025 752 1095 1090 873 749 416 635 665